straight ship??? On the leasebound tag???
It's more likely than you think!
KRISMAAAAAAAAAA
its so hard working @ the unhinged ask mines.. everyday i lift up my little broken fingers (they are broken from the transbian butch faes that break into my home everyday) as i shiver from the new strand of rabies (just invented it)
max verstappen
OH RIGHT, fair warning, ddt's unhinged sooo have fun
Ok
POINTS A GUN AT YOU!!! GIVE ME YOUR YIIK SHIPS RIGHT NOW OR ELSE IM GONNA YOK YOU UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Uhm I don't have a lot. I like focusing on them as friends bc I feel like that aspect wasn't focused on enough.
Vella and Chondra
Rory and Claudio
JACOBTINA WAHHHHHHH
Went kind of wacko yesterday and managed to pump out 5 whole doodles
My back hurt really bad by the time I went to bed (´°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥`)(。ŏ﹏ŏ)〒▽〒
what I wish people would understand about fundraising for gaza is that while everyone is desperate and I would never say not to fundraise for or donate to individual families-- I currently fundraise to support multiple friends' families-- the overwhelming narrative I see on Tumblr that the best and most ethical thing you can do is send money to individuals and there is no option for anything else is so so incredibly damaging and inadvertently lends support to the marginalization and distrust of any remaining communal social infrastructure. the sameer project, which you should donate to, talks about this in a recent video they put out. the situation in gaza is unimaginable and everyone is in need of a huge level of support, and yet this fundraising discourse by well-meaning people in the west that donating money to individuals is the only moral way reproduces societal divides wherein resources are directed to people who speak English, who have relationships with people outside of gaza, and who have internet access while hundreds of thousands are left behind.
there ARE non-ngo locally based grassroots initiatives working to meet those needs however they can, and your small donation goes a lot further with them because they are able to buy food/water/supplies in bulk at a reduced price and reach more people with less money. again I'm not saying people shouldn't fundraise for individuals because these initiatives are so limited and many people cannot access them -- but as an example, the group I fundraise with is currently serving people fleeing north gaza who are starving and have nothing, and when we fundraise enough to do cash aid distribution there's so much need that our partners can only distribute 100-200 per large family. and then I go online and see people who have absolutely no understanding of this context at all exclusively working towards raising tens of thousands for just a few people when evacuations haven't been possible for months. it's good to do whatever you can but please consider how this narrative being reproduced among westerners trying to help that there are no other options has the potential to damage groups working towards equity and wider reach however is still possible